So much has been said about Alfred Gangata’s appointment—hailed by some, debated by many, and quietly ridiculed by those who see it for what it really is: a consolation, not a calling.
According to Malawian political analyst Lyson Sibande, Gangata’s appointment is “pure appeasement and consolation politics disguised as recognition.”
“Let’s face it,” Sibande says. “Gangata worked hard for the party in the Central Region during the September 16 elections. His money, machinery, and mobilization gave the campaign visible traction on the ground. He was present, effective, and politically deserving of higher consideration.”
But when the running mate question came up, Sibande notes, Gangata was passed over—“tossed aside when it mattered most.” In political strategy, Sibande argues, Gangata had everything going for him: he came from the right region, had deep grassroots connections, and held real influence over the central electorate. Yet, when the final decision was made, “he wasn’t even in the room.”
Now, Sibande observes, the appointment as “Minister of State” feels more like an afterthought—a symbolic thank-you rather than a substantive role. “It’s just a way of saying ‘sorry Alfred,’” he says. “If it’s any consolation, here you go—Minister of State—whatever that even means.”
Sibande further questions the constitutional basis of the title. “Where in the Constitution is there such a thing as a ‘Minister of higher ranking’? It doesn’t exist. It’s political fiction, created to soothe wounded pride.”
In Sibande’s view, the appointment reveals the government’s tendency to reward loyalty over merit. “Gangata deserved better,” he says. “He fought for the party, helped deliver votes, and got sidelined. Now, they’re just trying to make it look like he’s been elevated—when in truth, it’s a delayed apology dressed up as promotion.”
Still, Sibande concludes with a touch of irony: “Congratulations, Honorable Gangata. You’ve been rewarded for loyalty—just not in the way you probably deserved.”
